"As one of Europe's largest venture capital company, we test the newest and ongoing world-leading technologies. After careful research, we were convinced that the product of Riverbed, for an acceleration of our WAN, is the optimal solution.The product could be installed absolutely easily and has excelled our expectations by far - both in the areas of bandwidth capacity and latency. "
Stuart Paterson,
Director IT Group,
Scottish Equity
Partners
The Wide-area Data Services solution is sometimes confused with other application acceleration products. With so many vendors claiming to provide “application acceleration” products, it is important to understand different approaches and their limitations.
Despite years of innovations in various areas of WAN performance, the throughput of applications over WANs has historically been quite poor. Some approaches focus on bandwidth expansion, some optimize specific protocols, some attack the problem through caching, and others by prioritizing traffic. While compression, caching, QoS, WAFS, and other technologies have their place, until now no vendor has provided a fully-integrated solution that addresses the multiple root-causes of poor application performance.
| Approach | Limitation |
WAFS | Stores files locally in order to avoid requests going across the WAN |
|
Compression | Applies algorithms to data in order to decrease the volume of data moving across the WAN. |
|
Protocol Optimization | Modifies the behavior of TCP across the enterprise WAN |
|
Caching | Stores local copies of files or objects so requests can be served locally |
|
Web Application Acceleration | Offloads requests from a web server by storing commonly requested objects on another server
|
|
Only Riverbed delivers a complete solution to wide area networking problems, by enabling Wide-area Data Services (WDS). Riverbed addresses all the key factors that slow application performance over WANs: high latency, limited bandwidth, “chatty” transport protocols, and even “chattier” applications.
As vendors have realized that the above approaches don’t meet enterprise needs, they have tried to partner with other companies or acquire other technologies in order to claim greater functionality. The problem with this approach, however, is that these combined products often still have limited functionality and can be incredibly complex to manage. Furthermore, these vendors face the challenge of integrating multiple disparate architectures, leading to a haphazard, inconsistent approach to accelerating applications.
With some vendors incrementally adding functionality, it is seemingly getting harder to differentiate one application acceleration provider from another. In order to do so, you can use a few simple criteria: